Different fallacies in the news Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Different fallacies in the refreshings - Essay ExampleBut before conclusion fallacies in the news, one should be awargon of the different strains of fallacies being used. A common type of hallucination is a slippery slope error in which the writer suspects that they need to continue the idea which they take int like if they have once opened it. That is why, in slippery slope illusion, the results of actions specified are overstressed in order to alarm the reader of the message. It is called slippery slope fallacy because once the writer has interpreted a step in a certain direction, he cannot then stop and close the topic simply. So, the writer exaggerates the parametric quantitys in order to pave way to close the topic. Marsha Blackburn, a Republican Congressman, giving question to Fox News said the people are not interested in starting new businesses because they are not certain that they get out gain access to the capital funds that they will contend for their business es. Moreover, there is also doubt about the levy rates. So, the people are not much lean towards businesses. However, the premise was just a fallacy as where the taxes that worth 700 billion dollars are being utilise by the banks if they are not lending monies to businesses. He also exaggerated the uncertainty and doubts about the tax rates which are not doubtful to this level and also not much fluctuating. Another form of fallacies is hasty stimulus generalization fallacy. Sometimes, the writer is incapable of arriveing complete learning about the subject of his interest. He, despite of bothering himself to obtain complete information, makes haste and write about the topic on the basis of information he contains. The scenario becomes worsened when the writer also makes conclusions on the basis of insufficient and limited evidence he holds. The hasty generalization fallacy is very common in the sense that in many cases, some people in a group are observed and then it is assume d that all the members of that particular group will behave in the manner as observed. The third, and rather worse, type of fallacy is ad hominem fallacy. The writer when disagreeing with the argument of an individual criticizes and pin signs the character of the writer in spite of the argument presented by him. The intention behind this fallacy is to destroy the writers credibility. Once the credibility is lost, how stronger the argument is, it will lose its importance and significance. The briny problem with this fallacy is that it sometimes weakens the correct argument also. A classic example of ad hominem fallacy is the discussion that took place between Michael Moore and Bill OReilly, a television reporter. The topic of the discussion was the sine qua non of war against Iraq. Moore did not discuss the topic clearly. However, he pointed out that the President Bush lied to the nation. He also said that it did not suit to the president to lie. By saying this, Moore did not specif y his point of view. He only attacked the honesty and integrity of the president Bush. Thus, Moore indirectly opposed the war of Iraq but did not say this directly. Another type of fallacy is the fallacy of relevance which causes flaws in the interrelationship of premises and information with the conclusions. This is same to some extent to ad hominem fallacy. In ad hominem fallacy, the integrity f the person is attacked incorrectly while in fallacy of relevance the information and conclusions are interrelated wrongly. So, both these fallacies include the interrelation of information and c